Fairness O’Connor authored that the reading “substantially depart[ed] regarding well-paid Earliest Amendment jurisprudence” and you may is “incompatible with our State’s important dedication to private religious versatility
” 494 You. S., at the 891 (viewpoint concurring during the wisdom). Justices Brennan, Marshall, and you can Blackmun protested that almost all got “mischaracteriz[ed]” and “discard[ed]” the fresh new Court’s free-get it done jurisprudence coming to help you “perfunctorily discount[ing]” this new “compensated and inviolate idea” one county laws burdening spiritual versatility get remain only when “rationalized of the a persuasive focus that cannot end up being served by quicker restrictive setting.” Id., from the 907–908 (Blackmun, J., entered because of the Brennan and Marshall, JJ., dissenting). Continue reading Four Justices emphatically disagreed with Smith’s reinterpretation of the Free Do it Term